The desk
About Humva
A publication about AI avatar video that has never run the tools it writes about, and puts that on every page rather than in a footer.
What this desk does not claim
The Humva desk has not used HeyGen, Synthesia or D-ID. No trial account, no avatar trained on anyone's face, no footage and no test.
That is stated first because it is the fact most likely to change how you read everything else, and burying it until a reader notices would be the same trick this site spends its comparison pages documenting.
What it does instead
Three things, none of which requires having used the product, and all of which a reader can repeat.
- Reads what vendors publish, and records the date. Every price on this site carries the page it was read from and the day it was read.
- Derives the arithmetic in public. Cost per finished minute is not published by any of these vendors, and it is the only way three different billing models become comparable.
- Cites people who did run the tools. Every judgement about output quality carries a name, a publication and a date in the sentence that makes it.
None of that is as good as a controlled test of our own. It is considerably better than an unsourced verdict, and it is honest about which of the two it is.
Why a publication with no product exists here
Because almost everything else ranking for these questions has something to sell. On one term this site targets, nine of nine results were owned by companies selling a competing product, by the vendor itself, or by a marketplace that would not serve a reader without an account.
That is not a scandal and it is a gap. A reader comparing three tools is currently being sold to by every page they can find, and there is room for one that is not selling any of them.
- What this desk sells: placements, disclosed.
- What it does not sell: any of the software on these pages, in any arrangement.
The three desks
Each answers one question and refuses the others, which is why they are separate rather than blended into one long buyer's guide.
Prices
The pricing desk
Every published plan ladder, each figure carrying the vendor page it came from and the date it was read, with cost per finished minute derived rather than quoted.
Comparisons
The comparisons desk
Three platforms read on one unit, a controlled head-to-head reported with its method, and an audit of who owns every other list ranking for these terms.
Reviews
The reviews desk
Reviews assembled from the published record, with a named source for every judgement and no score out of five anywhere.
Why only three tools
Because three publish a full plan table anyone can read without an account. That is the condition of entry, and it is a deliberately narrow one.
A tool that quotes rather than publishes may well be excellent. It cannot be compared, cited or re-verified six months from now, so it gets named on the relevant page rather than ranked on it.
- What that costs: coverage. Plenty of real products are absent from this site.
- What it buys: every number here can be re-derived by a reader with the same public pages and about ten minutes.
The same rule keeps the site out of the adjacent category entirely. Tools that render a scene from a prompt rather than a presenter from a script are billed per second or per generation, and folding them into a plan comparison would produce numbers with no meaning.
- They get named as out of scope on the pages where a reader would reasonably expect them.
- An absence a reader notices is worse than one the page explains.
The same applies to consumer avatar apps, which make a stylized profile picture rather than a presenter speaking a script. They are a genuinely different product and comparing them to a video platform on price would mislead everybody involved.
What the desk is actually good at
Reading a pricing page slowly. That sounds trivial and it is where most of the findings on this site came from: a toggle that opens on the annual figure, a license row below the fold, a second price table served to some countries, an FAQ that contradicts the table above it.
None of that required running the product. All of it required reading the whole page, twice, with the arithmetic written down.
How this site pays for itself
Guest placements, disclosed. This desk takes no affiliate commission on any tool it names, which matters because most of the pages competing with its comparisons do.
The full commercial position, including what a payment cannot buy, is on the disclosure page, and the sourcing standard is in the editorial policy. The sourcing and review standard behind it.
Where to start
Route by the question you arrived with rather than by the brand you have heard of.
- Wondering what a tool costs, honestly: the pricing desk.
- Choosing between two: the comparisons desk.
- Wondering whether one is any good: the reviews desk.
- Wanting to correct something on a page: the contact page.
Work in AI video?
We take pitches from people building and using these tools. Tell us what you know that the vendor pages do not.
Pitch a guest postStill comparing?
Every figure on this site carries the page it was read from and the date it was read.
See the pricing deskBy the Humva Desk. Checked against primary sources and updated .